So, I've been writing about Ron Paul a lot lately. Well, there's not a lot being said about him on the establishment media who decided long ago to ignore him, so I figure why not write about him? He's drawing large crowds at rallies. He's getting lots of delegates to bring with him to the Republican convention. He has, in fact, won more delegates than any other candidate from some of the caucus states where the vote was just a poll, nothing more, and it's the delegates that matter. That's news worthy. Since the establishment media is determined to keep things hidden from the general public, it's up to little under read and mostly ignored bloggers like me to report on him.
Think about this for a minute. What happens if Ron Paul gets the most
delegates even after all the primaries and caucuses have been held and
the votes have been flipped, er, I mean counted, and the fraud has been
finalized, er, I mean Mitt Romney has been declared the winner? How is
that going to reflect upon the establishment media? Will people actually
begin to realize that they've been toyed with? Will they wonder how the
media could have missed such an important story? Will they finally get
the hint and stop paying attention to the media altogether and find some
more trustworthy, accurate sources to get their information from? Well,
I don't know. I'll say this, I think whatever the RNC decides to do, it
will be really tough to keep it out of the news.
There is the possibility that they will change the rules at the last
minute. That's my guess at how they will try to keep Ron Paul out of the
spotlight. If he brings more delegates, or even enough to cause a
brokered convention, they'll call foul and say the democratic process
was compromised and the popular vote should be what matters. Then he'll
make the claim that his campaign was merely following the rules set down
before hand by the Republican Party. If the rules change at that point
so that delegates have no choice but to vote for Romney, I hope Ron
Paul's campaign brings out the accusations and evidence of election
fraud. Wouldn't the media look stupid if they didn't cover that?
They could try to keep him out of the convention like they did in 2008.
They could try to smear him. They could try to spin his popularity. They
could try to appeal to the masses of Ron Paul delegates and supporters
to band together and back the Mittster so Obama can be at last be
defeated along with his socialist agenda. I got news for the
Republicans, it's not the socialist agenda that people should worry
about, it's the globalist agenda, and Mitt Romney is just as much a
socialist and a globalist as Obama, maybe more so. It's the devil you
know versus the devil you don't, and Mitt is the devil we don't know
this time around. It's either Ron Paul as the Republcan candidate, or
four more years of Mr. Soetoro.
It's interesting to wonder what would happen if Ron Paul ran third
party. The Republicans would claim he "took" votes away from Romney and
helped Obama win the election. But then, he's just as likely to take
votes away from the Obama crowd, after all, he is the only true peace
candidate out there. Besides, Democrats aren't stupid. They know when
they're being played. I bet Ron Paul could win running as an
independent, if the vote was counted honestly. Oh, there's that election
fraud thing again. Just another little story the establishment media
decides to ignore. I guess that's another reason I have to do the job
they're supposed to be doing. Maybe if these over paid pundits would
actually do some digging and some real thinking and stop chirping the
song those at the top tell them to sing, the general public would
actually get some decent information. But, they'd probably get fired for
that so they sit in their gilded cages chirping away.
What price is the media going to pay for ignoring Ron Paul? Will they
lose viewers and readership? They are already doing so due to not only
the convenience of the Internet, but the quality of the information that
can be found there. Will the establishment media continue to bleed away
customers as they are shown to be even more manipulated than imagined?
Will they pay a price at all, or will the ruling elite be successful in
their attempts to put the Internet genie back in the bottle, so to
speak? Will the chilling effect the feds are trying to put on free
speech with their Internet censorship bills (disguised as Internet
security bills) work? Will there be an establishment media bailout? Or
will that be a step too far for too many people for them to get away
with such measures?
Perhaps more importantly, what price will the people of the United
States pay for ignoring Ron Paul? It's good that so many have woken up
to his message, or are at least curious about it, but there are still so
many who are misinformed or don't understand and don't care to try to
find out. This is understandable as so many people lead busy lives and
don't even want to pay attention to politics. They seem to think that
politics has nothing to do with them or their lives. What they may not
understand is that politics is intruding upon their lives, more so every
day that goes by where these control freaks in Washington, DC remain in
power and assert more and more influence on the smallest details of
It is Ron Paul who advocates removing the burden of intrusiveness of
government from the backs of the American people. The other candidates
may talk a good game, they may promise changes to accomplish more
freedom, but their records suggest they will do the opposite. Their
records suggest they will heap more government burden atop the already
over burdened private sector. When was the last time you heard of a
federal law being repealed? I remember learning something about December
5, 1933, when alcohol prohibition was finally repealed after much loss
of life and treasure. Meanwhile other prohibitions have taken the place
of alcohol, but perhaps too many of us are too drunk to care about
those. As long as you are allowed your drug of choice, why should you
care about anyone else's?
Let's consider some more of the possible costs for ignoring Ron Paul. It
could cost us our national sovereignty. We could be relegated to being
subject to an armed world government with centralized powers. A little
far fetched maybe? Well, Obama has already started one war without
consulting congress because the United Nations asked him to. Many people
supported him. With that kind of precedent, how long until our
government is following United Nations' mandates without question? It is
a slow process, this global agenda, and both Mr. Obama and Mr. Romney
are globalists, in my opinion.
The price we pay could be trillions of dollars more than the taxpayers
of this nation have already been fleeced for. We complain about bailing
out the huge corporations, but we do little to nothing about it. Oh, we
latch onto someone who promises change, and delivers it to us. Only it
was change in the opposite direction that it was supposed to go. We get
more wars, not peace, more bailouts, not none nor payback, more
government intrusion on our lives, not less. Both Mr. Obama and Mr.
Romney are working for the banks, especially the elite central banks,
not against them. Only Ron Paul has proven his tenacity when it comes to
bringing accountability to the most influential of all institutions,
the Federal Reserve. Either of those other two guys are going to just
keep the fraud going and the money flowing to the top for another four
years. They are trying to suck the economic body completely dry of its
fluid currency. Only Dr. Paul addresses this fact and ignoring him could
cost us our current currency.
The greatest price we might pay could be our freedoms. This is
equivalent to our very nation. I remember in 2008, all the press about
how George W. Bush was shredding our constitution. I remember certain
Barrack Obama pundits celebrating in part because Mr. Obama was going to
honor the Constitution. Well, three years later, I think we know
better. Mr. Obama has not asked to repeal one overbearing, constitution
shredding law. In fact, he has signed several more. As the feds decide
to legalize violations of each of our precious individual rights, the
nation looks more and more like an authoritarian, police state
dictatorship. Either of the other two will keep this trend going. Only
Ron Paul honors the Constitution. Can we afford another four years of
having our rights tread upon? If so, what kind of a nation will we have
in 2016? What kind of a nation will our grand children live in? Will
they live in fear with limited choice, or will they have the
opportunities that freedom provides to better themselves?
Ron Paul cannot be ignored. His message can't be ignored. His supporters
can't be ignored. There are simply too many of them. His message is
simply too important. Try as they might, the power elite are not going
to be able to hide his importance much longer. You can't cap a volcano
and expect it to not erupt somewhere else. Freedom is ready to erupt
into our cultural awareness. It is ready to flow into our society. It is
ready to be reborn as a worldwide phenomenon. I only hope it is allowed
to do so in a peaceful rather than a violent manner.
My archives can be found at my website szandorblestman.com. Please visit there to read more and support me by making a donation.
The wait is finally over. I am overjoyed to announce that, after 16 years, "The Legacy of the Tareks; book 2 of The Black Blade Trilogy," has finally been released as an ebook. Get yours today! For those of you who have not yet read "The Colors of Elberia; book 1 of The Black Blade trilogy"
it is still available at smashwords. Here is a list of my works by
Matthew Wayne at different web retailers for your convenience. "The Edge of Sanity" at smashwords, Barnes and Noble, Kobo, and Diesel. "The Ouijiers" at smashwords, Barnes and Noble, Kobo and Diesel. Here are links to my book "The Blessings of Freedom, Creating Prosperity in the 21st Century" serialized version: Chapter 1. Chapter 2 and chapters 3 and 4. I thank you for your support.